Would you have your stomach removed if there was a very good chance that keeping it would kill you? That's the decision Mike Slaubaugh and his 10 cousins had to make.
Mike Slabaugh doesn‘t have a stomach. Neither do his 10 cousins. Growing up, they watched helplessly as a rare hereditary stomach cancer killed their grandmother and some of their parents, aunts and uncles.
Risk the odds that they might not develop cancer, with a 70 percent chance they would; or have their stomachs removed. The latter would mean a challenging life of eating very little, very often.
"We‘re not only surviving, we‘re thriving," said Slabaugh 16 months after his operation at Stanford University Medical Center in Palo Alto.
This story coincides with the news that UK scientists have developed a test that can screen embryos for serious genetic diseases. The test has been met with criticism from campaigners who say that it could lead to the destruction of embryos and the creation of 'designer babies'.
Is science moving in the right direction? Should we be screening for these diseases in the embryonic stages or should be focusing on curing these same diseases? What if if these defective genes are found in an embryo? Is destroying the embryo the right approach?